This year, the Senate
took up the issue of campaign finance for the fourth time since 2007, but it
has again been pushed aside. The legislation that would make campaign finance
more transparent, called S.20, will not be addressed again for at least another
year thanks to it being turned over to the Senate Judiciary Committee after the
Vermont Senate voted 19-9. The legislation would have
put into place new limits on campaign contribution “for lawmakers and
candidates for statewide office and created new disclosure standards for
political contributors.” What actually created the doubt and eventually sent
the legislation to the committee was the amendment that would have banned
politicians from directly taking money from corporations. This bill did not
emerge until April 2012, but was actually passed out of committee a year ago.
Now we are set back at least another year. S.20 would have clarified state law as a result of a 2006 U.S.
Supreme Court decision that brought down Vermont’s 1997 Vermont campaign
finance law. Supporters of
reforms in the Senate said “the existing system is an incumbent insurance
policy and too much money is spent on elections”; those who
opposed the bill said Vermont has fair and “clean” elections and that changing the
system is unnecessary. This article provides the stated positions of various
members of the Senate, and provides a clear illustration of the amount of money
involved in donations to campaigns.
No comments:
Post a Comment